Too bad Interpol and the UK authorities didn't consider how easy TV repair was. Two years after Export-Hoax-gate (see BAN's Night of Breaking CRT glass, Environmental Malpractice, and Clubbed to Death Blogs), Intercon police are still seizing African's containers, presuming the electronics were waste. Like a parent taking toys out of a crib, the paternalism of the "Project Eden" (putting Africa back the way it was?) stands opposing the African Revolution, the Arab Spring, the democratization which flows directly through used display devices like twitter to teenagers.
The two "root causes"? BAN made up a fake number, and rich countries know so little about electronics repair that we make museums about it. "Once upon a time, we replaced capacitors too, honey". Fixing things is so "hunter gatherer", it seems to belong in a stoneage village.
Meet the other side of the table. If you live in a place, like Lagos, that still does a lot of electronics repair, you wonder why people don't ask you how to repair the TV they seized. That's what the UNEP study finally did - and discovered 91% repair and reuse in Lagos. But it was too late for Joe Benson.
Here is a minute of Joseph Benson, describing Bullyboys in his own words.
This is about power. It's about BAN and Greenpeace showing they are watchdogs. They follow Saul Insky's model, enforcing their vision of segregation of trade, in a weird money-making way. This is about paternalistic decisions about who Nigeria or Ghana, Africa is allowed to trade with. Is Africa to be denied the path of development followed by South Korea, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia? Or is Africa going to be relegated to mining raw materials for our new electronics, a resource-curse economy? After Indonesia, Africa is the next battleground for Good Enough Markets, Tinkerer Blessing, and Resource Curse.
Puckett told me that - even if his math was wrong (It's 91% reuse, NOT 80-90% dumping)- that the "law" was violated ("a technicality" he says justifies Benson's arrest). What, exactly, is the crime the Africans are accused of? Dumping? Or like the Michigan case, is there some other technicality? The facts of the case are like background music playing over a slide show of Pieter Hugo exotic photos. The audio doesn't fit the video.
More cross examination:
Now, had Sky News or BBC or PBS or CBS etc asked Joseph Benson some questions, would they have still had a story? Or would they have a lot more work? Would Green and Thompson E-Waste Export Bill have been drafted? It would have at least been Jim Puckett's word that the exports were 80% bad, vs. Joe Bensons. Now they have the UNEP studies... but don't seem to be revisiting the story.
And they don't seem to have noticed the stealthy retraction two months ago, BAN back-stepping away from the initial accusation.
The two "root causes"? BAN made up a fake number, and rich countries know so little about electronics repair that we make museums about it. "Once upon a time, we replaced capacitors too, honey". Fixing things is so "hunter gatherer", it seems to belong in a stoneage village.
Meet the other side of the table. If you live in a place, like Lagos, that still does a lot of electronics repair, you wonder why people don't ask you how to repair the TV they seized. That's what the UNEP study finally did - and discovered 91% repair and reuse in Lagos. But it was too late for Joe Benson.
Here is a minute of Joseph Benson, describing Bullyboys in his own words.
This is about power. It's about BAN and Greenpeace showing they are watchdogs. They follow Saul Insky's model, enforcing their vision of segregation of trade, in a weird money-making way. This is about paternalistic decisions about who Nigeria or Ghana, Africa is allowed to trade with. Is Africa to be denied the path of development followed by South Korea, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia? Or is Africa going to be relegated to mining raw materials for our new electronics, a resource-curse economy? After Indonesia, Africa is the next battleground for Good Enough Markets, Tinkerer Blessing, and Resource Curse.
Puckett told me that - even if his math was wrong (It's 91% reuse, NOT 80-90% dumping)- that the "law" was violated ("a technicality" he says justifies Benson's arrest). What, exactly, is the crime the Africans are accused of? Dumping? Or like the Michigan case, is there some other technicality? The facts of the case are like background music playing over a slide show of Pieter Hugo exotic photos. The audio doesn't fit the video.
More cross examination:
Now, had Sky News or BBC or PBS or CBS etc asked Joseph Benson some questions, would they have still had a story? Or would they have a lot more work? Would Green and Thompson E-Waste Export Bill have been drafted? It would have at least been Jim Puckett's word that the exports were 80% bad, vs. Joe Bensons. Now they have the UNEP studies... but don't seem to be revisiting the story.
And they don't seem to have noticed the stealthy retraction two months ago, BAN back-stepping away from the initial accusation.
"Despite your reading diligence however, it is unfortunate that you did not start by questioning the baseless assertions made by Adam Minter in his reckless article. Never has BAN ever stated that 80% of US e-waste is exported."http://retroworks.blogspot.com/2013/05/basel-action-network-explains-80-or.html