Showing posts with label e-waste. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-waste. Show all posts

The Congressional Quarterly: Duh: Traffic Jams at the Environmental Zoo

Duh: Traffic Jams at the Environmental Zoo

What if the “mystery” of African e-waste is best explained by the wonder of African electronics use?

CQ Researcher recently published Robert Kiener’s report, “Global E-Waste Trade: Can It Be Successfully Reduced and Regulated?.” Robert spent about two hours interviewing me, and he seemed genuinely intrigued by the contrarian view.

The mystery of used electronics appearing in African cities may be best explained by the wonder of Africans using electronics.

Duh.

Accra. Lagos. Nairobi. Cairo. Cape Town. Pretoria.

What is the first thing almost every tourist, researcher, aid worker and white savior encounters after leaving the airport?

Traffic.

Your first hour in Accra should disabuse you of Greenpeace’s image of Agbogbloshie as some remote fishing village where Europeans secretly dump computers. Agbogbloshie is about 20 minutes from the airport—which, in Accra traffic, means it is extremely close to the airport. You could practically walk there.

Those traffic jams are full of automobiles. Automobiles contain steel, aluminum, batteries, catalytic converters, motors, circuit boards and copper wiring harnesses. They wear out. They are repaired. Their parts are harvested. Eventually, they are chopped into scrap.

Automobile scrap is far larger than electronic scrap. Yet when researchers photograph copper wire burning at an African scrapyard, the wire is routinely presented as evidence of imported electronic waste. The Smithsonian’s Adam Minter reported from Agbogbloshie that the burning wire included everything from automobile wiring harnesses to tire threads, that automobiles were being dismantled throughout the scrapyard, and that electronic waste was only a small part of the material being processed there.

The traffic jam creates automobile scrap whether or not a European spreadsheet records it.

But what if automobile scrap is held to the same standard of accounting as Kiener applies to E-Waste?

If it isn’t measured in Europe, did Africa recycle it?

"IT'S ALIVE!" Author Stephen King's Personal Vintage FM Broadcaster To Go Back Online In Ghana, Africa

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Vintage Stephen King FM Station Broadcaster “Rises Again” for Halloween—Bound for Accra, Ghana to Champion Reuse & Recycling




IT’S ALIVE!

Middlebury, VT & Accra, Ghana — [October 28, 2025] — In a season made for re-animation, a piece of broadcasting history is getting a second life. A 1980s-era FM radio broadcast station once used by author Stephen King has been recovered in Maine by Matthew Strong, a retired electronics recycler, collected and conserved by Good Point Recycling of Vermont, and purchased by BridgeSolarPower.com CEO Emmanuel Nyaletey of Ghana. The vintage gear will be co-owned by BridgeSolarPower.com and Good Point Recycling and installed in Accra for community programming that spotlights electronics reuse, safe recycling, and circular-economy jobs.

Broadcast Electronics FM10 10Kw FM transmitter with qty 4 4CX7500A tubes

“Finding this equipment felt like uncovering a time capsule,” said Matthew Strong, who recognized the significance of the station and preserved its key components. “It’s satisfying to know the next chapter won’t just be museum glass—it’ll be on the air, creating public value.”

The project pairs BridgeSolarPower.com’s energy-access mission with Good Point Recycling’s fair-trade reuse ethos. “Stephen King helped make Maine famous for stories that travel,” said Robin Ingenthron, spokesperson for Good Point Recycling. “Sending this gear responsibly to Accra—where radio still stitches communities together—turns a great story into a working system. It proves that reuse, when done right, is not a horror show—it’s the hero of resource conservation.”

BridgeSolarPower.com will host the restored studio as part of a public-interest broadcast initiative focused on right-to-repair, safe handling of end-of-life devices, technician training, and the economics of reuse in African markets. The programming will include interviews with local repairers (“the real experts”), call-in shows on product longevity, and segments demystifying environmental compliance and downstream accountability.

“This isn’t nostalgia for nostalgia’s sake,” said Emmanuel Nyaletey, CEO of BridgeSolarPower.com. “Ghana’s tech sector runs on ingenuity and repair culture. A functioning broadcast studio gives us a megaphone to share practical advice, highlight good actors, and inspire young people to turn reuse into careers. It’s about jobs, access, and dignity—and doing it transparently.”

To Matt Strong, it was not immediately evident that Stephen King’s broadcaster had survived since it was decommissioned.  “When we arrived at the transmitter site, it was obvious that nobody had been there for quite awhile… the door stuck… And as we got it open, it erupted into the Sargasso Sea of ticks. They were everywhere, outside, inside the equipment, and began to crawl all over us!  We all agreed it could be a theme for a Stephen King story.”

The partners emphasized that all international movements are being managed with proper documentation and that the equipment, once commissioned in Accra, will operate as a teaching platform for electronics testing, safe refurbishment, and compliant materials handling. “We want trade readers to see the model: verify demand, document flows, elevate local technicians, and measure impact,” Ingenthron added. “That’s how reuse outperforms disposal.”  The three businesses are aligned under the mission of FairTradeRecycling.org, an international NGO based in Middlebury, Vermont.

Specifications

STEPHEN KING’s Broadcast Electronics FM10 10Kw FM transmitter with qty 4 4CX7500A tubes, one installed and 3 spares (all filaments test good). Complete manual, large box of (new) spare parts, spare blower motor (new in box).  Tuned @ 103.3 (was WKIT in Bangor Maine) 

Made in October of 1987.


About BridgeSolarPower.com

BridgeSolarPower.com develops community-scale energy and technology solutions in West Africa, bridging access gaps with practical, locally serviced systems. The company invests in training, local supply chains, and circular-economy practices to keep equipment in service longer.

About Good Point Recycling

Good Point Recycling (American Retroworks Inc.) is a Vermont-based, ISO/R2-certified electronics reuse and recycling company known for Fair Trade Recycling partnerships and transparent downstream management. GPR supports right-to-repair, technician training, and data-driven environmental compliance.

Media Contacts

Good Point Recycling (Vermont)
Robin Ingenthron, Spokesperson
(802) 382-8500 | press@goodpointrecycling.net | GoodPointRecycling.net

BridgeSolarPower.com (Ghana)
Media Relations
info@bridgesolarpower.com | BridgeSolarPower.com


Halloween kicker: From the King of horror to the kings of reuse, this station isn’t haunting the attic anymore—it’s back on the air. In recycling, we don’t fear the afterlife… we call it a second life. 👻📻


Recycling Is Not a "LIE": Part 3. Alexander Clapp says I'm an Expert?

 


Waste Wars: A Journey Through the World of Globalized Trash

Forthcoming from Little, Brown & Company

Try out this logic.  

"Health Care Is a LIE, because everyone receiving health care will eventually die".


So I just found out that Alexander Clapp, author of the NYTimes Opinion editorial saying that Recycling Is a Lie, quotes me personally as an expert. Page 135. 

Yet, he does not respond to my direct messages, offers to dialogue, or follows (Linkedin, BlueSky, XTwitter)... So I'm following his posts and will buy a used copy of his book when it is available, but this "Health Care Is a Lie" logic is patently false.  

The 2006 NIH Report by Charles Schmidt, where the misleading quote is pulled from, was based on a trip I made to Asia 20 years ago with Total Reclaim of Seattle president Craig Lorch, and native (2nd generation) Mandarin speaker Lin King of WR3A.org and University of California (recycling program manager).  I had not been to Africa since 1987, and was trying to explain to Mr. Schmidt that the HUGE CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS IN ASIA - SUBCONTRACTORS FOR DELL, HP, ETC. were certainly not importing 80% waste. When he asked about Africa importers, I knew that they were not running 50+ huge factories with up to 1500 employees, 3 shifts a day, seven days per week.  And during that interview, I was also trying to remain friends with Mr. Jim Puckett who was making the (false) claim that 80% of used electronics trade violated the Basel Convention.

AFTER this interview with NIH Schmidt, the following occured.

1. I went to visit our buyers in Africa - with my whole family - and learned that they were Tech Sector professionals who knew WAY more about the electronics they were purchasing than USA recyclers did.

2. I sent multiple emails to the 2006 study author between 2006 (when I complained about the coverage even then) leading right up to 2013, when I invited him to attend the Middlebury Fair Trade Recycling Summit. See email to the author at bottom, with the list of speakers and experts meeting to discuss the "e-waste hoax" BAN had by that time created.  

3. 2013 was the year Jim Puckett of BAN disavowed his own claims in the 2006 Charles Schmidt NIH study - actually claiming he had never ever made the 80% illegal export claims.

In a sample email to Schmidt copied above, I was imploring him to update the 2006 study I'm quoted from, and he submitted my offer to his editor at NIH, who in 2011 turned it down.  Instead, Adam Minter that year visited multiple importers (and domestic Chinese e-waste buyers) for his book, Junkyard Planet.  Which like his second book, Secondhand, interviewed me and our WR3A members directly and on multiple occasions visited them.  

Electricity Usage Disproved Allegation of 80% Dumping

Electricity usage in emerging markets has been closely monitored by international financial institutions such as the World Monetary Fund (WMF) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since the 1960s as part of their broader efforts to track economic development and growth indicators. Monitoring electricity consumption is crucial because it serves as a key proxy for industrial activity, economic progress, and overall living standards.

1. Why Electricity Usage is Measured:

  • Economic Development Indicator:
    Electricity consumption is directly correlated with economic activities such as industrial production, transportation, and services. In emerging markets, growth in electricity demand often reflects rising industrialization and improvements in household income.

  • Energy Policy and Infrastructure Planning:
    Data collected helps policymakers and international organizations identify energy needs, infrastructure gaps, and potential areas for investment in energy production and distribution.

  • Sustainability and Climate Monitoring:
    Emerging markets are major contributors to global energy demand growth. Tracking their electricity consumption helps assess their carbon footprint and progress toward cleaner energy transitions.

2. How Data is Collected and Reported:

Both the WMF and IMF utilize various data sources and methodologies to measure electricity usage in emerging markets, including:

  • National Statistics Agencies: Governments provide data on power generation, distribution, and consumption by sector (residential, commercial, industrial).
  • Energy Ministries and Utilities: Reports from national and regional energy providers offer insights into grid expansion and rural electrification efforts.
  • Satellite Data: More recently, organizations have used satellite imagery to estimate electricity usage in regions where official data may be scarce or unreliable.
  • Surveys and Economic Models: IMF and WMF incorporate electricity consumption trends into their economic forecasts and structural adjustment programs.

3. Trends and Findings Since 1960:

  • 1960s-1980s: Rapid industrialization in regions such as Southeast Asia and Latin America led to significant increases in electricity demand.
  • 1990s-2000s: Privatization and deregulation of power sectors in many emerging economies improved efficiency but also highlighted challenges in affordability and access.
  • 2010s-Present: Focus has shifted toward renewable energy integration and reducing dependence on fossil fuels, with emerging markets investing heavily in solar and wind energy.

4. Challenges in Measuring Electricity Usage:

  • Data Reliability: Some emerging markets lack robust data collection systems, leading to discrepancies or gaps in reporting.
  • Unregistered Consumption: Informal settlements and unauthorized connections often go unmeasured.
  • Energy Theft and Losses: Technical and non-technical losses (such as power theft) distort actual consumption figures.

5. Role of the IMF and WMF in Energy Policy:

Both institutions provide policy recommendations, technical assistance, and funding to support sustainable energy development in emerging economies. Their reports often include projections of energy demand growth and suggest reforms to enhance energy access and efficiency.


In conclusion, electricity usage in emerging markets has been systematically tracked by organizations like the WMF and IMF since the 1960s, providing valuable insights into economic development trends and infrastructure needs. This data helps shape energy policies and investments aimed at fostering sustainable growth in these regions.

Emmanuel Nyaletey and BridgeSolarPower.com

Emmanuel Nyaletey and BridgeSolarPower.com

One must always balance the expression of joy against the "humble brag".  From time to time, I can't resist open enjoyment of the staffers and buyers who came to Good Point 


At this year's Orlando E-Scrap Conference, Emmanuel Nyaletey (and Patty Whiting) will be on a panel with our old friend, Jim Puckett.

Blog Readers will doubtless remember Jim Puckett's description of Agbogbloshie ("on the outskirts" of Accra rather than "dead center") in his creative writing essay "A Place Called Away". Less familiar, perhaps, was Emmanuel's 2014 X.com (TWITTER) video describing what Agbogbloshie actually is/was, from the point of view of a Ghanaian who grew up blocks away and who refurbished computers as a kid in Ghana.

The BridgeSolarPower.com plan is to work with OBADA.io to create Digital Product Passports. Africans who purchased secondhand solar panels - upgraded due to high real estate costs in OECD nations - can tag (QR code, blockchained) and regularly report on reuse for carbon credits.

Who might be against that?

Google Warning - retroworks.blogspot.com losing 592+ Posts

Well, it was a depressing email in my gmail box this morning.  Google will stop indexing a huge number of posts from this blogspot.

I've always been aware of my mortality, and of the mortality of my ethical recycling messages. I have books on my shelf which are long, long out of print, which are both central to my morality and my thesis, and which I know are unlikely to ever be read again, much less appreciated by mentorees.

But the first one I looked at in the Google Indexing purge kind of stung.

It was from autumn 2009, when I had been a background check source for CBS Sixty Minutes producer Solly Granatstein, about Scott Pelley's notorious "wasted" minutes flying around with BAN.org's Jim Puckett, who was describing huge imports of CRT desktop monitors (purchased for $10 apiece, bearing only $2 of scrap copper) as being "primitively" mismanaged in Guiyu.

http://retroworks.blogspot.com/2009/08/cbs-60-minutes-wasteland-unseen-footage.html

Solly and Michelle Rey had stopped responding to my emails asking them to run a follow up or correction to the story, which had shown no evidence of CRTs processed in Guiyu, despite the claim "we followed the trail".


So I checked that one, and because the film evidence of the factories that had actually purchased the monitors circled by helicopter were posted in picasaweb, a google product offered to bloggers like myself for photo uploads, and Google has since stopped supporting picasaweb, that the blog will no longer show up in searches.  So if you are a journalism student looking for CBS Wasteland's Polk Award on CRT disposal allegedly occuring in China in 2008, you won't find me.

A lot of people I met - "Swordfish" - in my career met me through the circulation of that specific blog. Author Adam Minter for example asked what to look for when he visited Guiyu (the three-story integrated IC chip market - Guiyu was a reuse-of-CPU and chips market, not a CRT monitor refurbisher. And what is upstream of the river where BAN's "samples" showed poisons more associated with textile manufacturing than e-waste). Adam later visited CRT remanufacturing factories. He's a journalist with actual knowledge of recycling. But the blog that connected us is now gone unless Google accepts my correction (now linked to photos.google not picasaweb).

But am I going to take the time to re-edit 520+ blogs? I had to find the one on CBS Wasted Leads via the Wayback Machine site to locate it and find the dated address to correct it on blogspot.

It's the April Fools Blog Day?

Seriously, some of the best and most read Good Point Ideas Blogs were on April Fools Day.

But Jim Puckett and BAN were the subjects of the best
ones. And He is a Nobody Today.

UNITAR Global E-Waste "Monitor" 2024: Better, but still kinda cringy?

I have yet to read more than the Executive Summary and Table of Contents of the new UNEP Global E-Waste Monitor report, but I can already see that it's being mis-reported.  The "hook" is an emergency, that only 22.3% of e-waste is "documented", and the rest (the Executive Summary implies), is presumed to be "improperly" managed or "lost" to the so-called "informal sector".

Readers may remember this blog previously defined "informal sector" as "a white person didn't enter it into a spreadsheet"... in response to the "Criminal Negligence" 2015 Report.

UNITAR (another UN agency) describes the reports findings as follows:

"Meanwhile, less than one quarter (22.3%) of the year’s e-waste mass was documented as having been properly collected and recycled in 2022, leaving US $62 billion worth of recoverable natural resources unaccounted for and increasing pollution risks to communities worldwide. "

The "five fold growth" in "e-waste" is describing worldwide generation, not just wealthy countries.  This raises questions about the measurement of "undocumented" used electronics... but lets list a few obvious premises.

1.  The size of electronics PER CAPITA is declining due to the miniaturization effect.  In 1992 it peaked because we needed a desk phone, an answering machine, a fax machine, a camera, a radio, etc.... all of which now fit inside the smart phone in my front pocket.  

2. The export market, which the previous 2015 UNEP Report described as "primitive", is mostly for reuse.  So if there was less e-waste generated in the past compared to the future, that can only be explained by the continuous reuse of past devices which continue to be reused and maintained in places like Ghana, Nigeria, Angola, etc.  

3. The UNEP reports conflate the end of first consumer use with "waste generated", as if reuse and repair, if not "documented", is in the "ewaste" volume assesssed.  That would mean that if a white person owns a TV for ten years, and it's purchased and reused by an African for another 40 years, that the "waste" is counted twice - the first time it was "generated" and the actual "end of life" of the TV.

Photo of TV Repairman Ibrahim Alhassan in Savelugu, Ghana, who we introduced to author Adam Minter, who wrote about Ibrahim in the seminal reuse non-fiction book "Secondhand: Travels in the New Global Garage Sale".  Ibrahim was repairing a 1970 Japanese CRT television, or rather improving it by addint a remote control function absent in the original knob-tuned TV.  This TV certainly would have been destroyed by "Big Shred" in Europe decades ago... but hard to describe the African's continuous use and extended life as "primitive"... unless you are a wee bit racially-profilly.



Third Try With ChatGPT Audit of This Blogspot

 ChatGPT


ChatGPT

Thank you for the clarification. Allow me to revise the explanation to accurately reflect the perspective of the retroworks.blogspot.com blog:

The retroworks.blogspot.com blog was pivotal in challenging common misconceptions surrounding the export of electronic waste (e-waste). Contrary to prevailing beliefs that a significant portion of exported e-waste was harmful or non-recyclable, the blog advocated for a different narrative. It argued that a considerable percentage, approximately 80%, of e-waste exports were actually beneficial and conducive to responsible recycling practices.

This perspective was based on the premise that not all e-waste exports were destined for illegal or environmentally damaging operations. Instead, many exports consisted of valuable materials and components that could be effectively recycled and reused in environmentally sound processes. By highlighting the positive aspects of e-waste exports, the blog sought to challenge the stigma associated with such practices and promote a more nuanced understanding of the global e-waste trade.

In doing so, the blog played a crucial role in reframing the discourse surrounding e-waste management and fostering a more balanced and informed dialogue on the subject. It encouraged readers to reconsider prevailing assumptions and engage in critical analysis of the complexities surrounding e-waste recycling and export practices.

Overall, the retroworks.blogspot.com blog was instrumental in challenging misconceptions and advocating for a more nuanced understanding of the e-waste trade, particularly regarding the potential benefits of responsible recycling practices associated with e-waste exports.

The Noble Informal

Today's blog is just a placeholder for another I've been working on for a few days. 

The topic is my invitation to present to a group of African Environmentalists on the Topic of E-Waste Management in Africa. 

Youth in E-Waste and Greentech Summit

The paper introducing the conference quotes Global Transboundary E-Waste Flows Monitor as follows:

"According to the Global Transboundary E-waste Flows Monitor 2022, Africa generates over 2.3 million metric tons of e-waste annually, with only 1.2% of this waste being collected and recycled in an environmentally sound manner in an ecologically sound manner. The informal waste management sector handles a substantial amount of e-waste, collecting and recycling the majority through unsafe treatment methods. These practices harm the environment and pose severe health risks to women, children, workers, and fenceline communities. The informal e-waste sector's low-value recovery methods perpetuate poverty and hinder sustainable development."

I have been invited by Agabas Ayudor of Appcyclers, who spent a week at Good Point in Vermont last month learning about how hand disassembly leads to more reuse and repair than grinding and shredding.



If I'm able to present, my title will be The Noble Informal, and will focus on Retroworks de Mexico, which opened in 2007, and which for 13 years operated an e-waste demanufacturing facility in Sonora which was banned from the Tucson Arizona contract it was awarded based on the exact same made-up narrative. The Arizona companies who impugned Las Chicas Bravas as "Primitives" wound up creating the largest hazardous CRT waste pile in America - possibly the largest on earth.  The women who ran Retroworks de Mexico in fact recycled the only CRT glass from Arizona that came from that pile.

Africans presenting the dystopian rumors about Africa Tech Sector to young Africans is something that should keep European tax payers up at night.  This is 2022, not 2012, when the lid came off of Basel Action Network's 80% false claims, and the re-arrest of Joseph "Hurricane" Benson in the UK was issued based upon that false, faked, statistic.

I don't want to be pidgeonholed into writing about the same thing, but WHO IN ACADEMIA IS HOLDING GLOBAL TRANSBOUNDARY E-WASTE FLOWS MONITOR accountable for this propaganda?  


2008 R2 Version 1 Is a Public Document. Certify That You Conform To It

The original Responsible Recycler Version 1 was a public document. EPA in Washington DC paid a professional mediator, John Lingelbach, to host a series of meetings with environmental stakeholders and experts (myself included) to get a standard that ANAB and ANSI could ok various professional auditors, such as Orion Registrars or Perry Johnson Registrars to certify.

Here is a link to the original R2 V1 document, which is now very difficult to find online. I had to use the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (and I left them a donation, it's a really cool utility).

Conforming to a public standard is something a small recycling business can do without any legal third party, such as SERI or E-Stewards, taking a financial cut. You cannot claim to be certified BY that third party, and you don't get a certificate with a gold star. But you can pay for the exact same person, the exact same auditor, to come and audit your status as certifyable to your conformance to the 2008 standard. 



The Versioin 2 of the R2 standard arguably made no changes at all to the Version 1 other than make it a non-public, copyrighted standard. And that was more than arguably due to the financial interests of the certification organization that John Lingelbach formed in order to make a living and hire people to "maintain" the standard. And they do "Maintain" it, and ANAB and ANSI may or may not add value that ISO (which you have to also adhere to in order to get R2 certification) doesn't give you anyway.

Elective Upgrades Supply Good Enough Markets

Elective Upgrades Supply Good Enough Markets

Is imitation the sincerest form of apology?

There is a guilt dilemma in "First World" aka "Wealthy" aka OECD consumer markets.  While there are repair and delayed gratification reuse trends (my company sells about $25k per month worth of TV parts to USA repair shops), there is also a lot of guilt about "elective upgrade", which remains the driver of most new sales.

Organizations like Basel Action Network and Greenpeace made a false assumption about 2 decades ago that "e-waste" was a product of equipment failure and inability to repair. That Americans, Japanese, South Koreans, Germans, Brits and Italians patiently wait for their CRT televisions, flip phones, and Pentium 4s to become hopelessly unrepairable before buying a plasma TV, smartphone, or i-Series laptop. 

The fact that it is patently obvious to nearly everybody that it was not the case, in hindsight, has been a point of reflection of this blog since I started it in 2006. 

Unnecessary elective upgrades, if indeed they are discarded as "waste" (or sentenced to a desk drawer, attic, or file cabinet) are indeed a wasteful use of mined, refined, extracted raw materials. But if they are reused, they create access for poor people to establish a "critical mass of users" to justify investments in TV broadcast, internet cable, and the estimated 170,000 mobile phone towers today that connect the continent of Africa... all financed by secondhand flip phone sim cards, replaced by black technicians on streets like Lagos, Accra, and Kinshasa.


It's a story older than this bad head gasket... sold to a Cummins motor geek in Florida, who re-exports trucks to rapidly emerging markets. Roads were paved in Appalachia and Ozarks by hillbillies like my grandparents, who could only afford vehicles they were smart enough to buy and fix.

Oxpecker Bird 2 Blog: Appearing this week in E-Scrap News (In My Opinion)

Part 2 of the essay on the RERA-is-SEERA-is-AmericaCompetesAct has been picked up by E-Scrap News, "IN MY OPINION" Op-ed.

Here again is the section 30612 in the House Report version.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-zuxQILKwou7j8qCo62Bg-XBpxFEXLv9/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108266863784829595501&rtpof=true&sd=true

It did not make it to the Senate Version, text here.

\\https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4521/text

Fun fact:  CAER rep quoted in the Pro-30612 section was also, in 2006, selling to the same contract manufacturers I was selling to. I have photos.


This was a factory owned by Rowell Yang of Proview, who was in a much-publicized trademark war with Apple (Mr. Yang, who I met a few times, had trademarked "iPad" in China and Hong Kong).



So when Apple's lobbyist accuses the Chinese contract manufacturer of "counterfeiting", they mean... reuse is bad.

OXPECKER BIRD 1: SEERA Goes Off Like a Forgotten Land Mine in H.R. 4521


My company has long flittered around like a Red Oxpecker Bird, landing on the shoulders of great 

investors in the USA "E-Waste" industry.  We are occasionally recognized, allowed to sing, and hop about conferences looking for parasitic ideas in the ears of our industry. But the worst thing to happen in 20 years may be buried in the text of a major House bill, H.R. 4521. (annotated text link)

(helpful hint, don't open US Congress bill in Chrome, use MS Edge, there's a Chrome bug)



Here is the 2009 Version HR 2791 (don't try in Chrome)  H.R.2791 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Responsible Electronics Recycling Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress


Here is the 2016 Version  HR3559 (don't try in Chrome) 

Text - H.R.3559 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Secure E-Waste Export and Recycling Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

And Here is the current Recycled Version, which finally made it out of the House of Representatives.

H.R.4521 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): America COMPETES Act of 2022 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

Notice the 2022 bill, which passed the House, is buried inside the language of a much longer bill. This was not able, in 13 years, to survive on its own. This is Jedi Lobbyist, not NGO. No Senate member has heard any testimony This is an unmarked land mine.

Because the USA has strong OEM warranty laws (Magnusson Moss Warranty Act of 1975), OEMs have for years used more copper, stronger materials, and extra testing. Our electronics, internationally speaking, have "bullet-proof" reputaton. USA Home-Used is a stronger brand in Ghana or Cameroon than brand new from China. The USA has no competition in used goods. Our used goods are sought out, "solid state", it's a unique advantage USA consumers have if they want to sell their used goods abroad.

"America Competes Act" should recognize that simply by DEMANDING a #Right To Repair, we are bolstering our competitive position in the secondhand goods market.

This may take a few blogs but for the Swordfish Readers who follow the history and origins of these anti-reuse, anti-repair, anti-DIY, anti-#RightToRepair, Pro-Obsolescence, greedy mess makers behind this bill, some history boxes need to be checked.

The "short answer" to the Senate reconciliation or Conference Committee is why allow this RERA, SEERA, 13 year old land mine to enter the Senate version of the bill without ever a discussion or debate? Why does the self-same restrictive language supported by #ProvenFalse 80% bad export claims, #ProvenFalse bad for USA recyclers claims, suddenly get branded as a "national security" concern? The argument seems to be that if TV parts are allowed to be exported, that they might wind up as a reuse chip embedded in a US soldier's walkie-talkie. This absurdity is why the language of the bill, which has barely changed even as it's justifications could fail a high school creative writing class, is suddenly buried 13 years later, like a forgotten land mine.

It's the Anti-Reuse-Terminator 13. I'm 60 years old now, and it keeps reaching out and grabbing me like an unfriendly anti-Iron-Giant (classic animated movie about fear used to justify violence, and the potential for self-repair is the silver lining as the destroyed robot's screws, chips and pieces are seen to reassemble the friendly giant at the closing credits).