Part 2 of the essay on the RERA-is-SEERA-is-AmericaCompetesAct has been picked up by E-Scrap News, "IN MY OPINION" Op-ed.
Here again is the section 30612 in the House Report version.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-zuxQILKwou7j8qCo62Bg-XBpxFEXLv9/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108266863784829595501&rtpof=true&sd=true
It did not make it to the Senate Version, text here.
\\https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4521/text
Fun fact: CAER rep quoted in the Pro-30612 section was also, in 2006, selling to the same contract manufacturers I was selling to. I have photos.
This was a factory owned by Rowell Yang of Proview, who was in a much-publicized trademark war with Apple (Mr. Yang, who I met a few times, had trademarked "iPad" in China and Hong Kong).
So when Apple's lobbyist accuses the Chinese contract manufacturer of "counterfeiting", they mean... reuse is bad.
Oh, by the way, THIS equipment I photographed being unloaded in Jahor Bahru, Malaysia, was shipped by the spokesperson from CAER. Quandry... I'm not accusing him of doing anything I don't promote.
The OEMs in the HR language allow themselves to ship here.
The OEMs in the HR language don't want to allow their contract manufacturer to buy from you directly.
How is this a "responsibility" problem?
Watch the lobbyists. They are the same names opposing #RightToRepair
No comments:
Post a Comment