On June 17, Basel Action Network released another attack piece, accusing R2 Solutions of violating international law. In doing so, BAN has indirectly attacked my company, which chose to pay for R2 Certification rather than accepting E-Stewards written offer to pay BAN to certify our operation to their own E-Stewards Standard.
Here's an "as concise" critique of BAN's "concise critique", based on the following international law.
Here's an "as concise" critique of BAN's "concise critique", based on the following international law.
Article 17 of the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states:
1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation. 2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
There are three problems with BAN's analysis of their competitors at R2 Solutions. The third is the most important."The [R2] Standard suffers greatly from its seeming intentional avoidance of international law as it refuses to acknowledge or recognize the definitions and obligations, decisions and guidelines of the Basel Convention, which all developed countries, except the United States have ratified and implemented and is now globally adopted by 180 countries." - Jim Puckett