- Recycling reduces energy use in China.
- Recycling reduces toxics from metal mining in China.
- Recycling reduces coal mining deaths in China.
- Recycling creates jobs in China..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db316/db3169a1e56cd519dd905e3d9c0f8b5664ee06f6" alt=""
Add to that yet another report, from BBC, on how horrible mining is in China. Chinese mining deaths, per 10,000 miners, is 100x the fatality of the USA. Chinese today are awed that Chile is going to such effort to rescue metal miners stuck underground - in China, miners seem almost disposable.
Question: If the Chinese are dying by mining for the coal energy, and if metal mining releases hundreds of times more toxicity than metal recycling, and the Chinese are the best at reuse and repair, and they need jobs... just exactly how bad can "recycling in China" be?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f503/0f503b7745e98c8ae72a8ae43d4c05dca0d966cb" alt=""
Why not reward the best recyclers China has (and I have seen incredibly good Chinese recyclers), and overcome the worst recycling practices with free market, fair trade, incentives and training?
China has 16,000 active mines - most of which are illegal Saving energy and providing recycled metals seems a lesser sin than making them use the coal to cyanide/smelt the metals for the products we buy, made in China.
I prefer to "buy recycled", even when "made in China".
Too Good To Throw Away
Recycling's Proven Record
Table 1: Energy Savings and CO2 Impacts | |||||||
Energy Savings Per Ton Recycled | Energy Generated | ||||||
Materials | Grade | % Reduction of Energy* | Million BTUs | Equivalent in Barrels of Oil | Tons CO2 Reduced | Million BTUs | Equivalent in Barrels of Oil |
Aluminum | 95 | 196 | 37.2 | 13.8 | -1.06 | -0.2 | |
Paper** | Newsprint Print/Writing Linerboard Boxboard | 45 35 26 26. | 20.9 20.8 12.3 12.8 | 3.97 3.95 2.34 2.43 | -0.03 -0.03 0.07 0.04 | 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 | 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 |
Glass | Recycle Reuse | 31 328 | 4.74 50.18 | 0.9 9.54 | 0.39 3.46 | -0.34 na | -0.06 na |
Steel | 61 | 14.3 | 2.71 | 1.52 | -0.34 | -0.06 | |
Plastic | PET PE PP | 57 75 74 | 57.9 56.7 53.6 | 11 10.8 10.2 | 0.985 0.346 1.32 | 35.9 35.9 38.5 | 6.8 6.8 7.3 |
Mixed MSW | na | na | na | na | 10 | 1.9 |
Franklin Associates (1990), AL Associates, AISI, Phillips 66, Wellman (1991). Conversions
based on data from Love (1974), CRC (1978), Perry (1984), EIS (1990).
* Relative to energy required for virgin production
** Energy calculations for paper recycling count unused wood as fuel
na = not applicable
No comments:
Post a Comment