
Dunning-Kruger Effect describes a lot of activists on the right and left. The only cures are hindsight, skepticism, humility, and listening. Duck.
We slowly learn that "e-waste dynasty" is really not that special. It has been a good ride. It brought something new for career recyclers like myself to get excited about, after the goals of universal curbside recycling, recycled content, household hazardous waste collections, and landfill capping and closure became yawn-ho-hum.
And it is indeed important not to squander the carbon embedded in the manufacture of gadgets. Vital to respect the enormous burden of mining on Earth's habitats. Our demand for copper, silver, gold, zinc, palladium, rhodium, tantalum, and other minerals and metals to make our chips, capacitors and circuits is crushingly important.
But the "impact" of discarded electronics on landfills and foreign beaches has been overplayed. The associated toxics are far less newsworthy than "a-waste" (automobiles), original mining of the metals, original manufacture, or even the use and disuse of the electronics during its life.
What "the great e-waste crisis" offered was illusory superiority. In a vacuum of data and definition, we became our own titles. We announced ourselves as "non-exporters", or "professionals", or "stewards", or "certified". We became "Good guys". Our companies were "Creative", and "Synergistic" and "International" and "Solutions", all competing (for attention and investment) in "solving the e-waste problem".
A new cause is an opportunity to claim expertise as the journalists come looking. But what were we "experts" in, really, except the "topic" of a new category of scrap?
What do you know, really, about the oldest Texas Instruments calculator in your house? You've owned it 30 years. Are you an expert about its end-of-life? Does the fact that you own it, and the prospective buyer (in China) does not (yet), make you the expert on e-waste?
"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than is accurate. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude.[1] Actual competence may weaken self-confidence, as competent individuals may falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding.""Where Unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority..." How well does the Dunning-Kruger effect describe rallies to the cause of electronics recycling?
Everyone in the developed world, and billions of people in the emerging world, have something electronic which was worth a lot of money once and now isn't. It's the "wealth" of "e-waste" haves. You are a "have", I'm a "have". Six billion out of seven billion - the "non-OECD" - have been defined as the "have-nots". Yet 80% of them are actually "haves" as well. But if you are looking for a 30 year old "waste" item, like a TI calculator, you better look first among the "haves" of Christmas Past.
We have evolved to save things which we procured at cost. Our ancestors survived on the reuse of spear-heads, and scavenging biproduct bones. We are programmed to get value back out of things we have invested in. But if there's nothing economic to do with it, it just manifests itself as guilt.