![]() |
| Diablogs and Wiki-Greeks |
Elizabeth Chamberlin of IFIXIT (soon to take away the crown for the "Best Scrap Blogger in the World"*) has written about the Apple-criticism piece, and does a good job of examining the case against Apple without taking it hook, line and sinker.
The Anti-IPhone-graphic-activists display a lot of talent, sincere passion, and make some very valid points. They asked my opinion rather nicely, and I'm always looking for mature, grown-up conversations with environmentalists. But I'm disappointed not to have heard back from the authors of the piece. Below is a snippet of the dialogue, followed by my response and comments.
Hi Robin,Thanks for getting back to me. The graphic I was referring to lives here: http://www.mbaonline.com/cost-of-iphone/ Let me know what you think. I’d love to get your thoughts, and feel free to use it as you’d like!Thanks again, Jen
Hi Jen,If you want to see the piece we are both commenting on, find it via Elizabeth's blog... I don't really want to raise its pagerank if they are sending it out "looking for comments" but don't respond to the comments. An MBA is supposed to be a masters degree program, and work is supposed to be subject to peer review, response and debate...I really like the lifecycle focus on mining, coltan, etc. I lived in Africa and was in Rwanda, Burundi and DR Congo for awhile. The natural resources harvesting business has been a curse. The Worlds Most Polluted Places (TIME) are metal mines, not recycling yards.With that said, I think your graphic is pretty unfair to Terry Gou and Foxconn (Han Hoi Precision)... The Taiwanese "Geeks of Color" like Gou and Simon Lin (Wistron) and Rowell Yang (Proview) have been "racially profiled" by the left in the USA, I think. All three of those guys began as a "tinkerer" importing and repairing used electronics, then became a contract manufacturer (like Foxconn is for ... um... everyone not just Apple). They have done a pretty good job of learning 100 years of industrial revolution lessons in a decade.Foxconn is owned by the Taiwanese, managed by Hong Kong, employs labor from Cantonese Guangdong, and is regulated by Mandarin Beijing. It's pretty remarkable. The suicide rate is below that of similar scale operations (yes including the USA), when you have 1.1 million employees living in campuses the size of cities, you see rapes, robberies, and suicides at the same rate as you'd see in Detroit.Finally, the piece about Guiyu is completely inaccurate. There are no Iphones in Guiyu. Guiyu is almost all scrap generated in China. Shenzhen, Guanzhou and Hong Kong have basically grown into one metropolis which has the population of JAPAN, and Guiyu is the scrapyard.
If you want to know what happens to Iphones which wind up in China, check out this blog. http://techtravels.wordpress.com/shenzhen-phone-recycling- 1/ Visit all 4 pages on the cell phone recycling in China. I'm a socially conscious environmentalist. In my opinion, we don't do ourselves any favors with racist depictions of the Geeks of Color. It is a major embarrassment to the environmental community to have launched this "green scare" campaign against geeks and techs overseas. I urge you to imagine how you would feel if you were Mowgli... when sex worker, coltan mining, child soldiering is 30% of your job market, and you learn to fix a cell phone, creating affordable connections for people in your emerging market, or putting CRTs into internet cafes that become the center of Revolution 2.0, when you are recycling rather than mining, and green Americans portray you as some kind of a primitive, polluting, sorry, toxic victim.Again, bravo on the first half of your piece. But if I post it on the blog as is, I'm going to make some of the points I made above. If you are interested in really conveying the truth, I'll spend as much time with you as you want.





