Showing posts with label #plasticrecycling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #plasticrecycling. Show all posts

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Preliminary Data Released from Fair Trade Recycling "Plastic Litter Offset" Collection In Cameroon, Africa



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 28, 2023

Contact: Robin Ingenthron, Founder World Reuse Repair and Recycling Association [WR3A] robin @ fairtraderecycling.net 8O2 -377- 9166

Groundbreaking Report Unveils Critical Insights into Costs of Plastic Litter Collection Offsets in Africa: Key Findings Revealed

[MIDDLEBURY, VT] - Fair Trade Recycling, an export reform conservation group dedicated to partnerships in Emerging Markets to safeguard the planet's natural resources, is delighted to announce the release of a comprehensive report on a Two Year Pilot Project to test least expensive plastic litter collection in Cameroon, Africa. The report, titled "Reducing Plastic Litter in African Cities: Cost-Effective Methods and Potential for Recycling Offsets," presents groundbreaking discoveries based on a partnership between University of Yaounde’s new NGO Enprosa Action, WR3A (dba Fair Trade Recycling) and Good Point Recycling of Middlebury VT and Brockton, MA.

"We hope to make this effort ongoing, a win-win-win, for the environment, African jobs, and the plastic industry.,” said the lead researcher, Dr. Asi Quiggle Atud of Universite de Yaounde, Cameroon.

Authored by intern and translator Meline Marguet of Universite de Tours - IAE and edited by WR3A founder and president Robin Ingenthron, the report documents the incredible success of Dr. Asi Quiggle, Cameroun, in his investigation of the most cost effective method of plastic litter collection in Africa's ocean-facing cities.

According to Dr. Asi’s associate, Edith Mouafo, “to improve the environment it would be important to act on 3 axes: Improve waste collection methods in Africa, Raise awareness among populations on the importance of sorting waste at household level… and finally promote the development of industries for recycling these materials, their reuse and their energy recovery in other sectors of activity.”aa

According to Ingenthron, "I met Dr. Asi Quigle Atud 35 plus years after I had said goodbye to him - he was 5 years old - at my Peace Corps post in remote Ngaoundal, Cameroon - his father was my landlord and we shared a compound. When we reunited on Facebook, he was a month from being awarded his Ph.D in Urban Wastewater Management. " Ingenthron says that "on a lark" he raised $1500 (donation from Good Point Recycling and individuals via a GoFundMe campaign), and wired it to Dr. Asi Quiggle in Cameroon to come up with the cheapest way possible of diverting plastic litter BEFORE it washes to the sea and back on to the beaches.






Here are the members of the team who participated in the collection of plastic waste in Yaounde, Douala and Limbe during the period May-June-July 2023.

Dr. Asi and his team of students from U of Yaounde first published a 41 page report titled titled "Prospects for Recycling Offsets in Douala and Limbe" which documented how plastic litter discarded on city streets in urban centers is washed by annual stormwater runoff every rainy season, and predicted the time that plastic bottles would arrive in "bottlenecks" and choke points in city canals and gutters where Dr. Asi predicted the plastic would "collect itself" before more rain eventually washed it to sea.

According to Ingenthron "We were already astounded that a mere $1500 donation with no strings attached led to such an incredibly detailed report. Imagine our shock when Dr. Asi's team actually took the next steps the following year and demonstrated the cost effectiveness - by actually collecting the plastic bottles and delivering them to a recycler in three separate cities!"

Dr. Asi and the team established Environmental Protection and Sanitation Action (Enprosa Action) in an effort to actually capitalize on the opportunity to demonstrate the pilot project. The report being released this weekend shows the number of hours his team needed to collect several tons of plastic litter in three Cameroon cities - the capital Yaounde, the port city of Douala, and the anglophone beach city of Limbe.

In the first example, Yaounde, Dr. Asi and the Enprosa Action team spent 15 days focused on 8 different “litter concentrations” in urban water canals around the capital. The collections averaged 7 members per team, 4.3 hours per site, and collected in all 4.24 tons of plastic in a total of 7,748 labor hours. At Cameroon’s minimum wage, that would have cost $2,866 dollars.




Middlebury, VT based WR3A (an NGO funded primarily by Good Point Recycling) describes the potential for these plastic collections to be auctioned as “offsets”. Like carbon trading programs introduced in Europe two decades ago, the credits for the litter collection can potentially be auctioned to plastic industry giants, scrap plastic exporters, beverage industry giants, or even small recyclers like Good Point. Even cities whose recycling rates have stalled might choose to fund collections overseas rather than spend millions on diminishing returns to collect more plastic in their curbside programs.


Wilfred Mbah, a native of Limbe, Cameroun, former MA DEP Recycling staffer, is providing a peer review for the study. Mbah has just retired from DEP to accept a full scholarship at Harvard Kennedy School of Government and is providing advice and peer review for the study.“Dr. Asi may have invented a way to do that - and less expensively than sending westerners with nets to fish it out of the ocean.”




The group is sober about the potential for misuse, exaggeration, double counting, and “greenwashing” which has at times plagued voluntary carbon “offset” programs. In the coming months, Meline Marguet’s fellow intern from the University of Vermont, Nick Carney, will experiment with NFT’s and blockchain tracking methods to possibly address fraud or multiple claims of the same plastic diversion. But the potential for a dollar spent on “low hanging fruit” in a high employment ocean facing city to make a bigger difference than an additional dollar spent to collect litter in a western “silo of guilt” (like Vermont) is intriguing to the volunteers and sponsors of this project.




Dr. Asi concluded, “To reduce the rate of plastic waste, in our environment and especially in the sea, will require investment to industrialise plastic recycling in Africa. It is also important to sensitize the population on basic management of plastic waste and to involve all actors of economic circle to join their effort.””




Ingenthron and Dr. Asi are also conscious of the job opportunities litter offset might create. Cameroon’s official monthly minimum wage translates to $.037 per hour. Rather than “exploit” that inexpensive labor (a trope common among anti-export groups), Cameroon can employ an army of willing workers to collect and recycle its own litter. If the plastic can be re-sold for $0.35 per kg in baled form, the cost of “offsetting” could be even lower.







For a full copy of the report, visit fairtraderecycling.org.gg

Halloween Statistics: Greenpeace Quit Saving the Whales, Now We Must Save the DataJournalists



Happy Halloween!  This year, I'm going as a very scary statistic.

What do we do when someone with a reputation for caring about the poor, caring about endangered species, etc., uses their reputation to convince the Mainstream Press of a false math account? When they create mainstream story that exaggerates the actual problems - many of which are real - they create what #KirstenLinnenkoper labels "The Plastic Boogeyman" in this month's Recycling International.

Somewhere, deep in our amygdala, English Majors are afraid of math. English majors are more likely to become journalists - or "photojournalists" - than they are to be #datajournalists.  And we are seeing this routine over and over again, as a #CharityIndustrialComplex makes up numbers to scare reporters, who seem at a loss over how to fact-check.

Michal Manas, Baled PETE in Czech Republic, Wikimedia Commons


This year, the #fakestat is "Nine Percent".  Greenpeace snuck their own executive summary onto an otherwise sound piece of plastic recycling research.  And they get mainstream press to report that of all single serve plastic containers sold, only 9% of plastic containers are recycled. The conclusion they allow some reporters to leave with is that only 9% of the plastic in this photo above really gets recycled. At least, I heard reporters say that, and so far, Greenpeace and BAN have yet to correct it.

Nine percent sounds really bad. If you are a city, why even bother to pay for collecting those containers? If you are a resident, why bother putting PETE or HDPE into the blue bin? On NPR's "It's Been A Minute" a few months ago, the panel glibly announced SPECIFICALLY that of what you put into a recycling blue bin, only 9% really gets recycled.

Compare that to Aluminum containers. Putting aside that these stats themselves suffer from "Formal Sector" bias (many aluminum cans get recycled in China and Africa and India, where there is no formal "spreadsheet" to track it), the 9% Greenpeace statistic is awful compared to Aluminum Cans.

"Notably, while the Aluminum Association has reported a 45.2% consumer recycling rate for aluminum cans, the RRS analysis uses 38% as the national baseline to reflect the percentage of aluminum that actually makes it to remelting facilities, after material losses that occur during collection and sorting." 2022 Press Release, Ball Systems and RRS

So they divide recycled aluminum cans by all aluminum cans.


collected in the numerator

divided by cans manufactured in the denominator



The numerator of the Aluminum Statistic are tons of aluminum single serve containers documented to be recycled. (formal sector numbers).  Now, look at the Plastic report calculation, covered in Science.org in 2017... TITLE? 

Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made

"As of 2015, approximately 6300 Mt of plastic waste had been generated, around 9% of which had been recycled, 12% was incinerated, and 79% was accumulated in landfills or the natural environment."  https://lnkd.in/e_wN-t5j
See that? The numerator is plastic recycling - mostly single serve PETE and HDPE containers, though LDPE Film is also legitimately recovered.  All are reclaimed at higher than 9% rates - if we measure it the way aluminum cans are measured.  But if you follow the link to the study, the DENOMINATOR is all plastic ever produced.  Greenpeace divides the captured recycling containers and divides them by bottles PLUS child car seats, underground PVC pipe, auto bumpers, etc.



Recycled bottles in the numerator, divided by ALL PLASTIC EVER PRODUCED


 + 
 + 



In 2005, a year before I started this Blog, retired Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore published this in the Miami Herald - the same time BAN and Greenpeace started press releases about "ewaste exports"
http://greenspiritstrategies.com/the-environmental-movement-greens-have-lost-their-way/

Special to the Miami Herald

January 28, 2005

Scare tactics, disinformation go too far

I  am often asked why I broke ranks with Greenpeace after 15 years as a founder and full-time environmental activist. I had my personal reasons, but it was on issues of policy that I found it necessary to move on.

By the mid-1980s, the environmental movement had abandoned science and logic in favor of emotion and sensationalism. I became aware of the emerging concept of sustainable development: balancing environmental, social and economic priorities. Converted to the idea that win-win solutions could be found by bringing all interests together, I made the move from confrontation to consensus.

Since then, I have worked under the banner of Greenspirit to develop an environmental policy platform based on science, logic and the recognition that more than six billion people need to survive and prosper every day of the year. The environmental movement has lost its way, favoring political correctness over factual accuracy, stooping to scare tactics to garner support.

We’re faced with environmental policies that ignore science and result in increased risk to human health and ecology. To borrow from the vernacular, how sick is that?