From today's Wall Street Journal, a history of how we all got duped by bad science. If you can convince people that something normal - like eating bacon and eggs for breakfast - is an important (cognitive) risk, you can launch a multi-billion dollar industry to replace it. NYT also reports that the fat is not in the fat.
WSJ: "Butter and lard had long been staples of the American pantry until Crisco, introduced in 1911, became the first vegetable-based fat to win wide acceptance in U.S. kitchens. Then came margarines made from vegetable oil and then just plain vegetable oil in bottles.... All of these got a boost from the American Heart Association—which Procter & Gamble, the maker of Crisco oil, coincidentally helped launch as a national organization."
NYT: “My take on this would be that it’s not saturated fat that we should worry about” in our diets, said Dr. Rajiv Chowdhury, the lead author of the new study and a cardiovascular epidemiologist in the department of public health and primary care at Cambridge University..
The economical leveraging of our concerns about human health should not make us cynical about "accepted science". In comments to the WSJ article, there are people griping about climate change reporting. It would be too easy to jump to the cynical conclusion that doing whatever we want will turn out for the best.
However, the resulting cynicism also shows the cruel danger of supporting a marketing hoax. It can create collateral damage to agents of conscience in other fields. If the American Heart Association is full of baloney, people may shrug off exercise and calorie counting, which are still shown to be very important to our health.
My conclusion: Do No Harm. Apply scientific method. What the "e-waste" hoax has done to repair and reuse is nothing new... Big Corn or Big Shred or Big Brother are willing to dish out baloney. Watch what you consume.
The history shows a firm link between human cognitive risk assessment and industry marketing thereto. - Robin Ingenthron
No comments:
Post a Comment