I was proofreading Monday's piece on the "green-ness" of flat TVs vs. older technology.
 |
| HypnoToad Certified |
CEA claims that new electronics are more "environmentally friendly" than the ones they replace. The post considered the history of "green claims" (using 1990s "packaging" claims as a starting point), and how "green experts" grab whatever measuring stick they have handy to propose a ruling... based on their "expert opinion".
EPEAT is one attempt at third party certification of these claims; it is a little bit like "energy star". Like R2, it's based on meetings, conference calls, and consensus. E-Stewards is designed (behind closed doors) as a certification approved by another set of "experts". Here is the big question:
Who is the "expert" and on the basis of what facts do they tell us about our best environmental choices?
- See book vs. kindle.
- See ROHS solder vs. (recycled content) lead solder.
- See recycle vs. reuse.
- See export vs. shredding.
- See rare earth auto battery vs. improved gas mileage.
- See "paper or plastic" bags.
On Monday, I discovered a flaw in my own "pro-CRT-refurb" philosophy, or at least a clarification to be made. As it turns out, I've done a pretty good job of selecting partners, who were selecting the best and highest quality boards. But in defending them, I've defended the entire refurbishing industry - including those who use the same cheapo boards that cause the fast-failing LCDs to grunt and die. It may be time to roll the film and invite in the Monday morning quarterbacks.
"Green Expert" has a double meaning. A lot of our experts are "a little green" in the field of environmentalism. And by that I mean,
immature.
"In this trifling particular, then, I appear to be wiser than he, because I do not fancy I know what I do not know." - Socrates in Plato's Apology