One of the arguments that is ongoing is over the pessimism vs. optimism for globalisation.
Other species, and the environment, I'm tragically not optimistic about. My optimism about human lives is actually, in part, to get us to focus on worrying about things that really matter. Also, I think that unnecessary panic and pessimism, whether to Trump or Bernie, distracts us from making investments that might really matter.
So here goes. When we look at an optimistic video, like GapMinder (Hans Rosling), about more girls going to school, fewer diseases, less poverty, the statistics and facts are clear. Here is an interesting graphic - The World Poverty Clock.
57,913 people escaped poverty today (income levels increased)
11,508 people fell into poverty (especially in places like Venezuela, Nigeria, Syria and Yemen)
| World Poverty Clock Screenshot |
The graphic shows red (newly poor) and black (newly rich) stick figures, and shows countries in red or black according to how their own population is faring. I have some funnier videos at bottom.
Here's the argument people most often push back. Many people believe that the current generation of AMERICANS or EUROPEANS is less likely to be better off than their parents generation.
But there are two ways to pose the question. Are we living better than a previous generation? And if so, how did we afford it?