Pages

Footprints Vs. Fingerprints: Example of Environmental Own Goal (leadfree solder)

 My generation became invested in Recycling before the "Mobro Barge" and garbage crisis (closing of small unlined landfills under RCRA). 

The energy, carbon, environmental harm, habitat depletion, species loss, toxics, everything in mining and petroleum pumping, was the reason to recycle. We made a calculated bargain to put recycling into the waste management business, to benefit from rising landfill costs, but I have argued we lost our way.

Mining and forestry build roads into forests, which expose humanity to #bushmeat trade (illegal poaching). That brings endangered-species-platter to so-called "wet markets", which brings us HIV, AIDS, and Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) through chimp and pangolin and bat hunting.  

FOOTPRINT:  We pierce habitats because we don't recycle enough, and we need the supply of virgin raw materials.

FINGERPRINT: We obsess over our recycling - the costs, the quality, the access - losing site of the fact that recycling has always paid for itself if the cost of mining, forestry, and oil drilling have to pay for themselves as well.

Here's a reminder of our #owngoal, a Midgely-esque policy still championed as environmentally sustainable, which failed to do the math. ROHS, or leadfree solder.


Tin mining in SE Asia was practically extinct by 1980 (a high school friend's dad in Arkansas had lost his job because "bi-metal cans" demanded so little tin by then). We environmentalists re-opened this mining business because we were more obsessed with the quality of our waste than the recycled content and repairability of our electronic devices.

Saving the World Progress Report

Environmentalists are mentally multitasking between preserving scares natural resources for future generations, preserving endangered species, the climate change thing, and postponing World War Three.

In my end-boomer/pre-GenX age group, there's a growing mantra of #we'refucted.

To me, this mentality is realistic. It's like we're in a chess game and we've already lost so many pieces that "resign" is the only move suggested in the playbook.

But who is the real opponent in this chess game? Society? Lobbyists? Corporations? Overpopulation? Ignorance? This blog often focuses on #owngoals, #collateraldamage, #accidentalracism, #bullyboys, and other mistaken moves on our own chess playtable. But who is the actual opponent?



Sheer Bias and Racial Profiling: H.R. 4521 Disgusting Section 30612 is Based on Old Slander

Sheer Bias and Racial Profiling: H.R. 4521 Disgusting Section 30612 is Based on Old Slander

Here is a link to the sad ending of a 13-year old women's recycling collective in Sonora, Mexico.  It was profiled, vetted, and visited by NPR (Living on Earth and Marketplace), by Adam Minter (Bloomberg), and PBS (AZ).

My opinion Op-Ed about Retroworks de Mexico ran in Resource Recycling in late 2020. The "Chicas Bravas" were cheated out of their winning bid for the City of Tucson, accused by Arizona-based recyclers of using "primitive practices" including testimony at the Tucson City Council that they were "burning the CRTs in barrels". Tucson Clean and Beautiful visited Retroworks de Mexico and fought valiantly against the slanderous claims. But they never did get the business from Arizona afterwards. Scared of "exports", Arizona instead trusted its CRTs to a domestic solution... and wound up with tens of thousands of trashed CRT piles in the city of Phoenix (the infamous "Closed Loop" site). The Chicas Bravas in Mexico, by contrast, left the floor broom clean, having recycled every ton of CRTs they managed since opening in 2007.

https://resource-recycling.com/e-scrap/2020/09/24/in-my-opinion-how-bureaucracies-and-bias-sunk-a-crt-solution/

The House version of the America COMPETES Act is mostly full of good ideas, but the anti-"ewaste"-export Section 30612 doesn't simply ban junk going to non-OECD countries. OECD isn't mentioned. In fact, the section brands not only Mexicans, but Canadians and Europeans and Japanese and Koreans - as security threats if allowed to buy a used television or computer monitor, or toaster.

The Racial Profiling is the history of this bill since it was first introduced in 2010. CAER members have blithely portrayed the Tech Sector outside the USA as "primitive", using photos of junk TVs imported to Africa in the 1970s as perverse evidence of current export and use.


Today's blog is about photos and captions of the 13 year history of this anti-export language.