tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956717416810052129.post6637381483810896112..comments2020-12-27T11:13:53.134-05:00Comments on Good Point: Ethical Electronics, Recycling "e-Waste" Blog: Ethiopia "E-Waste": Good Video, Comment HubrisRobinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17669077665223573133noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956717416810052129.post-33571910417981034752012-03-05T17:19:46.232-05:002012-03-05T17:19:46.232-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Computer Recycling Louisville KYhttp://www.bluegrassecycle.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956717416810052129.post-56087185568822324812011-03-09T04:07:39.266-05:002011-03-09T04:07:39.266-05:00On reflection, the comment above by Jim Puckett is...On reflection, the comment above by Jim Puckett is his excuse not to respond to the dozens of logical and factual challenges posted in this blog over the years. Over a year has gone by since we dissected the 60 Minutes episode. He has never responded to the dozens of photos of refurbishing in the same factories that manufactured the monitors. I've asked how one can support manufacturer takeback as a solution while banning manufacturers (all of which are in Asia) of buying back. <br /><br />The point of Jim's accusation, I think, is to poison the well. He wants other readers to doubt my integrity and intellectual honesty. If I were crossing posts and deleting original articles, why should he attempt to respond? Why indeed. Perhaps he has already answered all my questions about Basel Convention Annex IX, or elective recycling, or numerators and denominators. <br /><br />Yes, it's a pissing match, but I am not cheating and I'm not making ad hominem attacks. BAN is applauding itself for costing people in developing nations hundreds of thousands of dollars, as repair technicians of color defend themselves from false accusations of "poisoning people". <br /><br />The cowardly thing is to accuse Geeks of Color of polluting when they have done everything to make sure they cannot be mistaken for a polluter. The shameful tactic is to run a ten year old photo of a child suffering in another context to justify a perverse boycott against the poor. That's far more important than the false accusation that I've somehow hacked google.<br /><br />Jim has had years to comment intellectually on the questions I've raised. This attack on the integrity of this blog is a cheap shot. It's nothing more than an excuse not to respond to fair questions. I will prove that it's a completely false accusation... google comments and posts are dated, Mr. Puckett. I've never deleted a comment of yours, or switched posts you've commented on. I just hope your accusation against someone capable of defending himself causes people to wonder about your attacks on people who cannot defend themselves.Robinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17669077665223573133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956717416810052129.post-30104772424701806982011-03-08T22:08:47.104-05:002011-03-08T22:08:47.104-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Robinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17669077665223573133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956717416810052129.post-66979178872618916122011-03-08T15:42:49.011-05:002011-03-08T15:42:49.011-05:00Dear Robin:
This will be the last time I try to e...Dear Robin:<br /><br />This will be the last time I try to engage you on your blog. You really are shameless. You have taken down your original post and now put up a new one which is not one I ever commented on. So my post is now seen in relation only to your very mean spirited rebuttal -- another one sided diatribe....far from being a fair debate. By the way I have never made 6 figures but would love to. I am not a racist, accidental or otherwise. We have a difference of opinion about what is good for the world. But Robin I am done. Not because I would not relish a fair debate but because you are not interested in one. <br /><br />JimJim Puckettnoreply@blogger.com